- Minimum Requirements
- Assigned Risk Plan
- Insurance Fraud
- Staged Auto Collisions
- Consumer Tips
- Improve Your Rate
- Insurance Scores
- What is SR22
- CLUE Reports
- No-fault Insurance
- The Right Company
- Umbrella Insurance
- Credit Scores
- Accident Forgiveness
- Pre-accident Condition
- Anti-theft Devices

Contributory Negligence.

Premium rates for car insurance Los Angeles, and all over the state of California are being affected by what insurance providers call contributory negligence. Car insurance in Los Angeles has changed in the way it has once perceived a policyholders “portion of responsibility” when involved in an auto accident.

First, when requesting cheap car insurance in Los Angeles, it is important to understand what comparative and contributory negligence means. Comparative and contributory negligence are defenses available to alleviate the amount that a policyholder may have to pay for damages if involved in an automobile accident and is found at-fault.

With Los Angeles low cost car insurance, each of these ways to lessen responsibility is based on an assessment of fault towards the policyholder. Depending upon the rules and regulations of the car insurance Los Angeles provider, one of three different versions of these defenses may be relevant to you as a policyholder. And as a consumer, it is important to research the Los Angeles discount car insurance providers and their options of these defenses.

Pure contributory negligence is, by far, the most severe to the policyholder. Some companies providing auto insurance Los Angeles allow this defense, if a policyholder can prove that the other driver involved is even a small portion to blame for the accident, he or she recovers nothing. For instance, if the evidence shows that a defendant was speeding and went through a stop sign and that the plaintiff was only one percent at fault because he or she didn't swerve or brake quickly enough, then the plaintiff may be entitled to no recovery of monies.

Less oppressive to the plaintiff and more prevalent are the two different versions of “comparative” negligence. The first version is what is commonly known as "pure" comparative negligence. In "pure" comparative negligence, the award of damages to the plaintiff will be reduced in direct proportion to the plaintiff's percentage of fault, no matter what the ratio. For instance, if you are 30 percent at fault for an accident, you could recover 70 percent of your damages. If you are 70 percent at fault for an accident, you could recover only 30 percent of your damages. All of the other parties alleged to be at fault would then be responsible for paying you 30% of your total damages, apportioned between them in proportion to the amount of fault assigned to them.

The other defense is known as "limited" comparative negligence. With this, in order to be able to receive any recovery of damages, the plaintiff must be no more than 50 percent at fault for the injury. If the plaintiff is no more than 50 percent liable, but is still partially at fault, then the award of damages will be adjusted according to the plaintiff's percentage of fault and the plaintiff's award will be reduced accordingly. Most experts in the industry agree that one should obtain at least three online insurance quotes!